Wednesday, March 30, 2011
Pictures speak Louder than Words
There is much criticism over President Obama's handling of Libya. I am not saying that some of this criticism is unwarranted, because it is rightly deserved, but most of it is ironic flip-flopping done by the opposition. I think this cartoon adequately sums up that no matter what our President did, he would be lampooned. Keep doing what your doing President Obama, don't forget you still have a lot of supporters out there.
Wednesday, March 23, 2011
Hitting the Nail on the Head
Daniel Kliman, a visiting fellow from the Center for a New American Security recently wrote an opinion piece for CNN. I think his piece hits the proverbial nail on the head.
To be a good leader in the 21st century, you need to multi-task. Canceling a trip to Latin American AGAIN would have been devastating for very important relations and economic deals. No longer can the U.S. ignore Latin America; they are a growing presence and strategic interest on the international scene. The president should be given more credit in shoring up our relationships with certain Latin American countries. He is demonstrating priorities, and I believe he's chosen the right ones.
Here is the opinion piece.
To be a good leader in the 21st century, you need to multi-task. Canceling a trip to Latin American AGAIN would have been devastating for very important relations and economic deals. No longer can the U.S. ignore Latin America; they are a growing presence and strategic interest on the international scene. The president should be given more credit in shoring up our relationships with certain Latin American countries. He is demonstrating priorities, and I believe he's chosen the right ones.
Here is the opinion piece.
Wednesday, March 16, 2011
What happened to less governement and strict constructivism, conservatives?
Disclaimer: If you don't like some bias, don't read this post
Modern hypocrisy at its best. The theme of going 'back to the constitution" used by republicans and conservatives in the 2010 elections seems to have been thrown out the window.
*An effort to encourage "In God We Trust" on "public buildings, schools, and other government institutions"
*Wisconsin State Senators proposing a bill to ban prank calling
*The Wisconsin Legislature in banning collective bargaining rights for unions
*In congress, security spending is not even touched by some conservatives, but they want to reduce the deficit? Cutting important social programs as part of an agenda does not strengthen America.
These are just a few instances, but actions are louder than words. Yes, there have been instances where Democrats have been hypocrites too. However, this is pretty unreal. If Republicans and conservatives were committed on "reducing the scope of government", why are they being blatant hypocrites?
You get what you vote for.
P.S. Here is one of my favorite congressmen making a very good point. We should be talking about jobs, not cutting them...
Modern hypocrisy at its best. The theme of going 'back to the constitution" used by republicans and conservatives in the 2010 elections seems to have been thrown out the window.
*An effort to encourage "In God We Trust" on "public buildings, schools, and other government institutions"
*Wisconsin State Senators proposing a bill to ban prank calling
*The Wisconsin Legislature in banning collective bargaining rights for unions
*In congress, security spending is not even touched by some conservatives, but they want to reduce the deficit? Cutting important social programs as part of an agenda does not strengthen America.
These are just a few instances, but actions are louder than words. Yes, there have been instances where Democrats have been hypocrites too. However, this is pretty unreal. If Republicans and conservatives were committed on "reducing the scope of government", why are they being blatant hypocrites?
You get what you vote for.
P.S. Here is one of my favorite congressmen making a very good point. We should be talking about jobs, not cutting them...
Saturday, March 12, 2011
Islamophobia: Rearing its Ugly Head once Again
I would like everyone who's taking the time to read this blog to watch a section of Fox's Bill O'Reilly Factor that one of my best friends sent me.
I cannot begin to express my disgust for Fox and this segment. There is no such thing as a "Muslim Problem". There is a problem called Islamophobia and a bigger problem called intolerance. I just can't help think of the hypocrisy coming from the conservative right in saying they're strict constructionist but they don't even respect the values enshrined in our Constitution. It was NOT the religion of Islam who attacked us, it was extremists. This is going to be my third post about Islamophobia, but it is a steadily growing issue which deserves attention.
Recently, most-likely presidential prospect and former senator Rick Santorum gave a fiery speech about how Shria law is evil. Newt Gingrich, over this summer's "Mosque at Ground Zero" fiasco, related Muslims to Nazis. This is unacceptable rhetoric and behavior coming from people who probably have presidential aspirations. The President of the United States is not just the president of Catholics, Protestants, Jews, or another segment of the population; the president is a representative and is the leader of Americans of all sects, beliefs, and religions. For one to single out a distinct part of a religion, and way of life, and to call it evil is childish and proves they are not deserving of the responsibility of the presidency. Muslims are indeed Americans too. Moreover, evil is a subjective and abrasive word. In a culture where we see many things as a dichotomy, Santorum is portraying he see's Sharia in the same league as terrorism, the Soviet Empire (in Ronald Reagan's case) and other things that bring about injustice and pain.
These intolerant comments come about at the time of congressional hearings, by Rep. Peter King-NY (R) on the radicalization of Muslim Americans. By labeling that ALL of Muslim America are radicals, it paints a completely false picture as well as accuses hard working Muslim-Americans into an insulting group. This a a modern day McCarthy style witch hunt. Disagree? Ok. Does anyone remember the Hutaree Militia in 2008? They were a christian extremist group. How about Unabomber Ted Kaczynski or Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh. Yes, they were both christian terrorists.
Now I am not saying that no Muslim American has ever been a terrorist, that is not true. However, domestic terrorists can come from all parts of the community and from different religions. Thus, specifically isolating Muslim Americans and associating them with radicalization and with terrorism is false and misleading. It is also unjust and misses the point. Instead of singling out Muslim Americans, instead the committees focus should have been on figuring on why Americans, of all creed, become radicalized and perform terrorist activities.
Banning Shar'ia law, as done in Oklahoma and being considered in other states, does nothing but exacerbate the problem of anti-Americanism. Instead of being divisive, disrespectful and intolerant, we as a community, as Americans, should work to find solutions and promote religious tolerance.
However, some "news" outlets disseminate fear and lies about people and groups. We must come together as Americans to stop this blatantly false bias and fear-mongering and work to solve this societal problems. It is truly against our values, against what America stands for, to single out a group or hate a group of people based upon their religion. If this "news" outlet truly loves America, as always make it known that they do, they should turn down the rhetoric and be fair to their fellow Americans.
The War on Terror is a war of ideas. In order to win a war of ideas, the key is make one of the ideas no longer appealing (radicalization). If we spent more time addressing why terrorism happens and fixing those issues than indulging in illogical bigotry, the world would be a much better place.
I cannot begin to express my disgust for Fox and this segment. There is no such thing as a "Muslim Problem". There is a problem called Islamophobia and a bigger problem called intolerance. I just can't help think of the hypocrisy coming from the conservative right in saying they're strict constructionist but they don't even respect the values enshrined in our Constitution. It was NOT the religion of Islam who attacked us, it was extremists. This is going to be my third post about Islamophobia, but it is a steadily growing issue which deserves attention.
Recently, most-likely presidential prospect and former senator Rick Santorum gave a fiery speech about how Shria law is evil. Newt Gingrich, over this summer's "Mosque at Ground Zero" fiasco, related Muslims to Nazis. This is unacceptable rhetoric and behavior coming from people who probably have presidential aspirations. The President of the United States is not just the president of Catholics, Protestants, Jews, or another segment of the population; the president is a representative and is the leader of Americans of all sects, beliefs, and religions. For one to single out a distinct part of a religion, and way of life, and to call it evil is childish and proves they are not deserving of the responsibility of the presidency. Muslims are indeed Americans too. Moreover, evil is a subjective and abrasive word. In a culture where we see many things as a dichotomy, Santorum is portraying he see's Sharia in the same league as terrorism, the Soviet Empire (in Ronald Reagan's case) and other things that bring about injustice and pain.
These intolerant comments come about at the time of congressional hearings, by Rep. Peter King-NY (R) on the radicalization of Muslim Americans. By labeling that ALL of Muslim America are radicals, it paints a completely false picture as well as accuses hard working Muslim-Americans into an insulting group. This a a modern day McCarthy style witch hunt. Disagree? Ok. Does anyone remember the Hutaree Militia in 2008? They were a christian extremist group. How about Unabomber Ted Kaczynski or Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh. Yes, they were both christian terrorists.
Now I am not saying that no Muslim American has ever been a terrorist, that is not true. However, domestic terrorists can come from all parts of the community and from different religions. Thus, specifically isolating Muslim Americans and associating them with radicalization and with terrorism is false and misleading. It is also unjust and misses the point. Instead of singling out Muslim Americans, instead the committees focus should have been on figuring on why Americans, of all creed, become radicalized and perform terrorist activities.
Banning Shar'ia law, as done in Oklahoma and being considered in other states, does nothing but exacerbate the problem of anti-Americanism. Instead of being divisive, disrespectful and intolerant, we as a community, as Americans, should work to find solutions and promote religious tolerance.
However, some "news" outlets disseminate fear and lies about people and groups. We must come together as Americans to stop this blatantly false bias and fear-mongering and work to solve this societal problems. It is truly against our values, against what America stands for, to single out a group or hate a group of people based upon their religion. If this "news" outlet truly loves America, as always make it known that they do, they should turn down the rhetoric and be fair to their fellow Americans.
The War on Terror is a war of ideas. In order to win a war of ideas, the key is make one of the ideas no longer appealing (radicalization). If we spent more time addressing why terrorism happens and fixing those issues than indulging in illogical bigotry, the world would be a much better place.
Coming soon...
For anyone who checks this blog at some regular interval, sorry for not posting on it for over a month. I've been pretty busy (aren't we all). Now that I have some free time, I promise to have another post up soon!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)